22-11-2016, 02:27
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/alec...spartandhp
Here's the latest affronted Trump reaction after Alec Baldwin's recent satirical sketches in Saturday Night Live that covered Trump's election shenanigans/extreme behaviour. The more Americans who watch this satire, the better! Look at Baldwin's reply to Trump and talk about putting an unscrupulous, seedy politician in his place with an element of humour and satire. The man made himself a target and you 'reap what you sow'!!! George Bush jnr became a similar target but this is different in the premature way that Donald Trump has already been targeted by lotsa critics and that includes me and sorry to say it Saint Charles Owl - I despair at the appeasing manner in which you seem to view this president, even though you never voted for him (thank god for that!) and some of the dismissive comments and comparisons re past fascism and 'slightly different historical scenarios' to the current USA one - the extreme methodology/politicising is the same!!!!! The threat may indeed be different but it is still there and many people world wide, incl many anti Trump Americans, will view that threat the same way. I hope you're right re the various 'legislative safety valves' that will hopefully curtail Trump's incursions into contentious political issues that he should not be getting involved in anyway. However, I assure you I will be one of the first 'critics' to tell you that you 'got it wrong' after this president elect settles in and starts to try and 'make his mark' as another poor American president with very little credibility or political clout attached to him whatsoever and it goes 'tits up'.
Re Bernie Sangster's presidential chances, I thought you got it right in your thread #73 with good reasons why he just wasn't reputable enough with no 'wow factor'! Then you changed your opinion in thread #76! I listened to a good number of political analysts who covered the involvement of Bernie Sangster and I hardly heard any one of these people differ from the view that you took in your thread #73 with their various reasons why he was never gonna succeed.
Here's the latest affronted Trump reaction after Alec Baldwin's recent satirical sketches in Saturday Night Live that covered Trump's election shenanigans/extreme behaviour. The more Americans who watch this satire, the better! Look at Baldwin's reply to Trump and talk about putting an unscrupulous, seedy politician in his place with an element of humour and satire. The man made himself a target and you 'reap what you sow'!!! George Bush jnr became a similar target but this is different in the premature way that Donald Trump has already been targeted by lotsa critics and that includes me and sorry to say it Saint Charles Owl - I despair at the appeasing manner in which you seem to view this president, even though you never voted for him (thank god for that!) and some of the dismissive comments and comparisons re past fascism and 'slightly different historical scenarios' to the current USA one - the extreme methodology/politicising is the same!!!!! The threat may indeed be different but it is still there and many people world wide, incl many anti Trump Americans, will view that threat the same way. I hope you're right re the various 'legislative safety valves' that will hopefully curtail Trump's incursions into contentious political issues that he should not be getting involved in anyway. However, I assure you I will be one of the first 'critics' to tell you that you 'got it wrong' after this president elect settles in and starts to try and 'make his mark' as another poor American president with very little credibility or political clout attached to him whatsoever and it goes 'tits up'.
Re Bernie Sangster's presidential chances, I thought you got it right in your thread #73 with good reasons why he just wasn't reputable enough with no 'wow factor'! Then you changed your opinion in thread #76! I listened to a good number of political analysts who covered the involvement of Bernie Sangster and I hardly heard any one of these people differ from the view that you took in your thread #73 with their various reasons why he was never gonna succeed.