[theo_luddite]

I would say mostly Snoots. Robins knew he could be a good player - he was sat in the stands when Scanz ran Leicester ragged in the FA Cup and scored a great goal. After that, how many starts did he give him? How may full 90 minutes did he give him? How many times, if he didn't turn a game in the 10 minutes he was given did he even pick him to sit on the bench?

Hey we're all human and if Robins thought Hammill could do a better job and he couldn't play both of them, it was up to him who he picked. But hey again, who did Robins really think was up to the job he wanted to be done on the right? My bank balance knows only too well how many times Hammill got subbed or only came on for part of a game too.

Could be interesting now there's apparently competiton coming up for that place on the wing.

Powell took 3-4 games to work out the nucleus of his starting 11 and Scanz is mostly one of them. That and he's got him defending too, which Scanz could always do (saw him do it to great effect at Forest last year but they double and treble teamed him to stop him coming forward), but Robins could rarely get him to do it during his 10,15-20 minute cameo's as he would curse his luck when he lost the ball rather than work hard to get it back.

Per Lillis - you don't match get fit only playing 10-15 minutes per game. Powell is also just as likely to sit you down for a couple of games (Wells a prime example, Scanz and Bunn didn't start against Ipswich) if it suits him tactically - so he's keeping all of them on their toes for now. Let's hope he's still keeping them on their toes come next Easter.