|
Scottish Cup quarter-final replay - ICT v Hibs
|
17-03-2016, 17:46
"Our "fall back" position is to accept the word of our Association chief "
 ffs the rangers fans were calling him corrupt and dishonest not so long ago. Some still do.
I cannot speak for them, if they indeed exist. Nor can you, for that matter.
However, Doncaster, for all his faults, is still intelligent enough to recognise the veracity of a legally binding judgement. It seems you aren't.
17-03-2016, 19:13
Lots of "legally binding judgements" have been proven incorrect,unlawful or unjust in the past.
Being so smart you should know that.
17-03-2016, 19:25
Aye take the word of donkeyaster or Regan I don't think so
17-03-2016, 19:28
17-03-2016, 19:53
You can't speak for them? No f#### wonder. It's all down to opinion and there's a strong opinion even amongst your own fans that the individuals who are currently in charge of RFC are the wrong ones again! We'll eventually see who is right and haven't you gone through a similar embarrassing exercise twice before? As a Hibs shareholder, I certainly wouldn't see these individuals anywhere near my footie club based on their personal profiles and the general poor behaviour of said individuals and I'd bet STF would back me up 100 pc re such a poor reference. There's too much 'firefighting', intimidationam, bullying and all kindsa shenanigans at your footie club - absolutely disgraceful considering it's associated to a game called football/soccer - it's ultimately only a game FFS!
17-03-2016, 19:54
(This post was last modified: 17-03-2016, 20:07 by hibeejim21.)
(17-03-2016, 19:28)Trusevich Wrote:(17-03-2016, 19:13)hibeejim21 Wrote: Lots of "legally binding judgements" have been proven incorrect,unlawful or unjust in the past. Its not binding on the supporters,who are perfectly entitled to take whatever view they wish. You will just have to live with that. (17-03-2016, 19:25)Fredstersafool Wrote: Aye take the word of donkeyaster or Regan I don't think so You would need to be extremely thick or trusting to place your "fall back" position on their words.
17-03-2016, 21:34
(This post was last modified: 17-03-2016, 21:38 by TheWorthinGer.)
(17-03-2016, 19:53)0762 Wrote: You can't speak for them? No f#### wonder. It's all down to opinion and there's a strong opinion even amongst your own fans that the individuals who are currently in charge of RFC are the wrong ones again! We'll eventually see who is right and haven't you gone through a similar embarrassing exercise twice before? As a Hibs shareholder, I certainly wouldn't see these individuals anywhere near my footie club based on their personal profiles and the general poor behaviour of said individuals and I'd bet STF would back me up 100 pc re such a poor reference. There's too much 'firefighting', intimidationam, bullying and all kindsa shenanigans at your footie club - absolutely disgraceful considering it's associated to a game called football/soccer - it's ultimately only a game FFS! What a rambling load of ill conceived, ill thought and ill written bullshit. (17-03-2016, 19:54)hibeejim21 Wrote:(17-03-2016, 19:28)Trusevich Wrote:(17-03-2016, 19:13)hibeejim21 Wrote: Lots of "legally binding judgements" have been proven incorrect,unlawful or unjust in the past. And should you declare yourselves Scottish League Cup winners 15/16 Ross County would just have to live with it as well. Or you could maybe just change the league table and conjur yourselves automatic promotion. View points and opinion don't matter a fuq: the facts prevail. 
17-03-2016, 23:49
The fact of the matter is that Hibs won through to the semi-finals of the Scottish Cup in a truly astonishing finish to the game.
ICT had us under the cosh for most of the second half and missed two absolute sitters after they had scored. Despite Hibs' discomfort in dealing with the ICT aerial bombardment, Alan Stubbs didn't bring on a substitute until after the goal, and then let Mark Oxley stay on after he first had trouble with his contact lens - I'm certain he's had this trouble before, as this would explain a lot! If he had trouble with his eyesight, then Stubbs should have hauled him off right away. It's Stubbs' decision, not Oxley's! As it turned out, Oxley staying on led to him being booked and missing the semi-final.  Apart from that farce, Hibs could have scored thrice in breakaways in added time, but no, that would have been much too easy - at least Henderson was foiled by a good save, not like Cummings and Stokes. Now, I agree I might be a hard taskmaster, but we were not in the least convincing in victory and I hope Stubbs is not fooled into thinking we were. Perhaps somebody who was there will put me right, but I was going by the radio commentary. This did say that Stokes scored two good goals, but I could have scored one of them. It also said that Hibs were hanging on at the finish. Having had all these moans, I'm still chuffed to bits about beating another Premiership team and getting to a Hampden semi-final. We've had a few extra replays in getting there, but we've stuck in and did the business when it mattered. GGTTH
Cabbage is still good for you
17-03-2016, 23:51
(17-03-2016, 23:49)ritchiebaby Wrote: The fact of the matter is that Hibs won through to the semi-finals of the Scottish Cup in a truly astonishing finish to the game. +1 for using "thrice". |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
