6 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 6 hours ago by Statesideowl.)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06...fferences/
The one that set a precedent. I've seen several cases now where solicitors from Ahmed, Ahmed & Sons have claiming 'cultural differences ' as mitigating circumstance for raping kids.
Incredible, because it's an open admission of everything I've said pertaining to cultural incompatibilities and regressive cultures. Gutter culture in general, quite frankly.
The courts are upholding this in some cases.
Astounding how the state and the religious community can have the audacity to cite these cultural differences as a defence after claiming people, like myself, who addressed these very cultural differences were "racist" and "Islamophobic"
It was only last year I recall posting about migrants gang raping a Dutch girl and their lawyer (a female of all things) used the defence of deep psychological trauma as a consequence of being forced to migrate causing them to rape white girls in order to vent...
Thats the truth. It absolutely happened. It will now continue to happen each time these compromised judiciaries handle future cases.
As was proven last week in Canary Wharf when a migrant waltzed in to a blind woman's house and the Police simply escorted the thing back to its Hotel, it was only due to public outcry the creature was arrested the following day.
So, just imagine the sheer volume of crime being swept under the rug in the name of 'diversity'
Topping it all off, we actually have faux left groups protesting against people/families/victims and survivors who want to stop grooming gangs and the systemic covering up of decades of rapes. Apparently this natzism??
What.. The.. Actual.. Fu*k is going on?
You're living a country where the judiciary allows 'cultural differences' as mitigating circumstance for raping kids, specifically native kids.
I do have to wonder where some people draw a line in the sand..
The one that set a precedent. I've seen several cases now where solicitors from Ahmed, Ahmed & Sons have claiming 'cultural differences ' as mitigating circumstance for raping kids.
Incredible, because it's an open admission of everything I've said pertaining to cultural incompatibilities and regressive cultures. Gutter culture in general, quite frankly.
The courts are upholding this in some cases.
Astounding how the state and the religious community can have the audacity to cite these cultural differences as a defence after claiming people, like myself, who addressed these very cultural differences were "racist" and "Islamophobic"
It was only last year I recall posting about migrants gang raping a Dutch girl and their lawyer (a female of all things) used the defence of deep psychological trauma as a consequence of being forced to migrate causing them to rape white girls in order to vent...
Thats the truth. It absolutely happened. It will now continue to happen each time these compromised judiciaries handle future cases.
As was proven last week in Canary Wharf when a migrant waltzed in to a blind woman's house and the Police simply escorted the thing back to its Hotel, it was only due to public outcry the creature was arrested the following day.
So, just imagine the sheer volume of crime being swept under the rug in the name of 'diversity'
Topping it all off, we actually have faux left groups protesting against people/families/victims and survivors who want to stop grooming gangs and the systemic covering up of decades of rapes. Apparently this natzism??
What.. The.. Actual.. Fu*k is going on?
You're living a country where the judiciary allows 'cultural differences' as mitigating circumstance for raping kids, specifically native kids.
I do have to wonder where some people draw a line in the sand..
"The opinion of 10,000 men is of no value if none of them know anything about the subject." Marcus Aurelius