Posts: 512
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
3
Drewks,
You are right, the debate will rumble on and on but there was contact-shirt pull. It wasn't enough to fall over so yes he was trying to exaggerate the contact and morally that is cheating.
But you could watch that(or any) game and anywhere on the pitch if a player feels contact he goes down. Several of our defenders did it when under pressure to get a free kick. That's cheating too.
Posts: 1,093
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
6
01-03-2015, 21:42
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2015, 21:45 by Slick_Footwork.)
Interestingly, on the same match of the day, Shearer and co were saying that Vokes should've gone down for
Burnley and that it was a mistake on his part not to go down when fouled.
Yet, on the same show, Sess was labelled a cheat for doing exactly that. Going to ground when pulled.
It's debatable if it's okay or wrong - but the pundits are just as inconsistent as the referees.
Last week for example, the pundits were discussing if Lescott should've been booked or sent off against Sunderland.
IMO, the contact from Lescott wasn't even worthy of a foul - but none of the pundits debated the award. None of
them labelled Graham a cheat when he went over when 'bushed' at most and was waving his imaginary red card.
Was the contact from Lescott a lot heavier than what Sess received from Clyne? IMO, neither contact was heavy
enough to send a football sprawling across the ground - yet in last weeks incident, Graham going to ground was
absolutely fine.
Posts: 512
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
3
Slick,
Well said. I do feel for refs who are being conned by players but look at the penalties being given for handball(how many have we had given against us lately!!) you see one given and the pundits say well his hand was raised and then you see exactly the same in another game and they say it wasn't a penalty !!
Still we are going to stop up and thankfully it won't be relying on decisions.
C O Y B - being on the Villa !
Posts: 1,397
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
5
It was embarrassing seeing an Albion player try to cheat so blatantly.
Sadly, Sess is a cheat and anyone who suggests his dive was justified is barking mad. I don't want my beloved Baggies labelled a cheating team and nobody can convince me otherwise. Win at all costs but those must be fair costs.
drewks and
DannytheBaggie like this post
Posts: 739
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
1
01-03-2015, 23:05
(This post was last modified: 01-03-2015, 23:06 by BBB.)
I'm just glad we won. The rest is irrelevant now, unless Sess is banned.
BBB
Posts: 917
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
5
02-03-2015, 05:13
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2015, 05:14 by aries22.)
Sess can only be dropped or fined by TP, not banned by the FA, because the referee saw the incident and took action by cautioning him. Only if the referee misses an incident can the FA take retrospective action. That's my understanding, anyway.
Agree that Sess nor any other Albion player should try to cheat. Foster needs to cut out the time wasting too.
Posts: 512
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
3
Lol ! Predictive text on your phone can be a swine !
Will try again !
C O Y B - bring on the claret&blueb'stards..
Whoops it's done it again !
Salopbaggie likes this post