[St Charles Owl]

I think everyone would agree to give me maximum points for a correct Gamball this week as you know for the good of the club I deliberately predict us to lose  

So as the scorer for the PL, can I take this as your admission that your prediction on the Gamball is actually incorrect and should read 3-2?? I will change that in my scoring table a absolutely give you the maximum deduction of -3 for predicting the loss.

[Beefy 1965]

Not fair

---

Bomber already has agreed to give me the points anyway

[bomberbrown1968]

Not fair  

---

Bomber already has agreed to give me the points anyway

Just for the record the original prediction was a 2-1 home win.

The "trying to deceive the scorer" rule should come into force which states : "the individual who alters their predictions in an attempt to deceive the scorers should still score -3 but must also carry a deduction of points that ensures he/she is, as a result occupying bottom spot in his/her respective league" .

After taking everything into account Beefy scores -3 and STILL remains BOTTOM

[St Charles Owl]

Ask Mr Owl if he's being reeled in  

I think your line snapped today!!!!

[Beefy 1965]

Maybe Mr Owl,however you must know that if I backed the Baggies I would be challenging for the title, you all should be grateful I'm giving you all a easy ride this year ....
Bomber I'm sure you made that rule up,as I can't actually see it in the official rules anywhere

[Zinman]

Beefy. Can I just say how much I appreciate you sacrificing points for the good of the Baggies. However rules are rules and your main issue is surely with the pillock who chose the Albion game as the gamball. Now, who could that be?