Thread Rating:
The Owls v The Village SBC Play off 2nd leg
#71
Fletcher and Hutch now mess up.
We need FF to get a chance
If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you need a team....
Reply
#72
Us 42% Them 58% Confused
Reply
#73
o ffs substitute reach !!

common now sthe time
Reply
#74
(17-05-2017, 21:28)OvalOwl Wrote: Us 42% Them 58%  Confused

To be expected but a lot of their possession is along heir back line.
Reply
#75
Both sides playing for penalties think Terriers could possibly have had one
Why should a man go to work, if he has the health and strength to stay in bed?
Reply
#76
fletcher off rhodes on reach ffs what can we do ?
Reply
#77
Is Andy Hinchcliffe so biased against us because he was an absolute f'ucking flop for us ? Laugh
and complicated
Reply
#78
Slow start from us but we had the better of the last 20 mins. I would like us to go 433, take off Reach put on Rhodes and play Forestieri behind them.
Reply
#79
not good not bad either reach is a xxxx up !! loovens the same !!! we need rhodes on for fletcher and somehow lee needs to be given more freedom to move upfront but with hutch on a yellow ? jones isnt good enough to back lee up for his attacks although he is good enough to see this through to penaltys ? and we don t want that do we !!

cant take reach off though charlie its the golden rule that when youve made the mistake of putting the wanker on ? you have to swallow the shit and hope and pray nobody noticed !!
Reply
#80
xxxx sky commentary is sooooo biased !!
Neighbourhood Neanderthal knuckledragger
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)