+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+----- Forum: West Bromwich Albion (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=21)
+----- Thread: SHOULD WE HAVE 2 PART SEASONS (/showthread.php?tid=4049)
SHOULD WE HAVE 2 PART SEASONS - BBB - 22-04-2016
When considering the two transfer times of the year, would it not be better if the we adopted our football seasons more on the continental lines.
Also does anyone think we have too many games and would like to see less - and in the sun?
Only a thought as I like it as it is.
RE: SHOULD WE HAVE 2 PART SEASONS - Salopbaggie - 22-04-2016
I think the money they are on, they should play all year, at least twice a week. The seasons should run first mach of the season on New Years day culminating with the last day of the season being Boxing Day. Transfers running throughout the year, to stop all the nonsense with players and agents. Clubs though could have a sale after Christmas where they sold any overstock of players off cheap. Failing that keep it as it, is with the exception of the transfer windows which I would get rid of and if I had the power, stop the moving matches just for Sky, for which I have 2 hopes, Bob Hope and No Hope.