+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+----- Forum: Hibernian (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=137)
+----- Thread: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY (/showthread.php?tid=3849)
Pages:
1
2
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - hibeejim21 - 06-03-2016
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35736241
Whats our thoughts about this happening ?
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - TheWorthinGer - 06-03-2016
Contentious can of worms. However almost inevitable in the money leagues.
I'd like to see an independent time keeper like they have in rugby league.
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - 0762 - 07-03-2016
Should've been done about 10 years ago and don't forget it was previously reckoned to be used by FIFA officials for that infamous incident when France's Zidane sorted out Italy's provocative defender, Marco Materazzi, in the 2006 World Cup final. If it works in rugby union/league then it will do the same in soccer - too many incidents being missed by too many soccer referees who are not good enough to deal with high tempo matches!!
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - St Charles Owl - 07-03-2016
Need to be careful what it is used for and the flow of the game has to be protected, I would hate to see a stop start situation. Goals can automatically be reviewed because the game has stopped, as can other things like fouls, corners etc. But this will take a lot of testing to get it right.
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - Paigntonhibby - 07-03-2016
As long as it's only used in the instances mentioned then aye ,one rule change I would like tae see is if a player is injured in a tackle and is awarded a free kick,and then has tae go off for treatment,the offending player should have tae leave the pitch until such times as either the injured player can return or a substitution has been made
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - hibeejim21 - 07-03-2016
On balance,i'm in favour of a pilot scheme. The proposals seem reasonable enough on the surface of things.
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - HerefordBull - 07-03-2016
With all forms of technology on the rise I feel the pressure on the authorities will mean it will come in.....especially as Worthing says in the big money leagues.
Most decisions in football can be seen in an instant whether the call was right or wrong......Griffiths v Hearts at ER, Lampard in World Cup v Germany. ( and goal line technology has already been used to good effect) Rugby takes so long as more often than not they are looking to see if a try was scored with 16 guys all falling over the line together and trying to see if the ball was grounded or held up.....usually requiring looking at several camera angles several times over.
I'd like to see a clock system similar to Rugby and mangers / coaches having 3 or 4 challenges per game to a ref decision. This would mean that more often than not, challenging the decision wouldn't be used as a time wasting antic if we still had to rely on the man in the middle using his time piece.
Cannot see it happening in Scotland any time soon.
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - ritchiebaby - 07-03-2016
As far as goal-line technology is concerned, I'm sure most decisions could be made by a video referee within 10 seconds. If a goal should have been awarded and play was allowed to go on by the match referee, then the correct decision should be relayed to him and the match continue as normal. It could become complicated if a red/yellow card offence occurred within those 10 seconds, but surely the powers that be could come to some binding agreement for that scenario.
I'd back TWG and Exeter on the clock system and Paignton re the injury/free-kick situation.
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - St Charles Owl - 08-03-2016
(07-03-2016, 23:32)ritchiebaby Wrote: As far as goal-line technology is concerned, I'm sure most decisions could be made by a video referee within 10 seconds. If a goal should have been awarded and play was allowed to go on by the match referee, then the correct decision should be relayed to him and the match continue as normal. It could become complicated if a red/yellow card offence occurred within those 10 seconds, but surely the powers that be could come to some binding agreement for that scenario.
I'd back TWG and Exeter on the clock system and Paignton re the injury/free-kick situation.
The goal line technology in the Premier League gives an instant response if the ball crosses the line directly to a watch on the wrist of the referee, there is no delay in the game at all and we saw it in action again this weekend. One thing that has been noticed is that the players accept this decision every time and there is no chasing the ref or arguing with him at all with these decisions now. Goal line technology should be used in every major league across Europe just like the same thing is used in every major tennis tournament now.
RE: VIDEO TECHNOLOGY - 0762 - 08-03-2016
Yep! It's a decent non-intrusive part of the umpiring/officiating system. I'd also add that I'd expect a football referee to have the option of calling in the video referee when he/she feels justified in doing so when an element of doubt arises - same as rugby!