+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+----- Forum: Rangers (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=131)
+----- Thread: RIFC (/showthread.php?tid=130)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 13-06-2015
(13-06-2015, 01:03)Fredstersafool Wrote: Don't you possible onerous contracts??I haven't a clue what you mean, so...possibly.
Cheers for tidying up.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 13-06-2015
Well you have no proof of what your saying do you?? You might be correct however there is nothing yet.
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 13-06-2015
The proof is the lack of income from the contract.
If you have ever seen how busy the megastore is at Ibrox on match day you would see that any contract involving the operation of that particular business were one party receives nil can only be described as onerous.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 13-06-2015
Absolute shite
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 13-06-2015
(13-06-2015, 13:56)Fredstersafool Wrote: Absolute shite
Yes, you are.
Go to work all week and if you get nothing in return come back and argue that it's fair.
Game theory is not your strong point. A partnership should, by definition, be mutually beneficial - if in fact it is a burden to one party then it is onerous. Your inability to accept that is predictable.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 13-06-2015
But rangers get a percentage back don't they??
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 13-06-2015
(13-06-2015, 18:29)Fredstersafool Wrote: But rangers get a percentage back don't they??
How many percent is zero?
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 13-06-2015
So Rangers receive money from replica kit sales etc is that what your saying??
RE: RIFC - St Charles Owl - 13-06-2015
Fred, I think what he is saying is that Rangers receive no money from the sale of merchandise. I thought I saw they get something, but that would probably be completely swallowed up by the expenses of just having a shop at Ibrox in the first place. From what I have read the contracts are completely one sided and should never have been signed by anyone at Rangers, whether that makes them onerous is where the debate should be!!
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 13-06-2015
(13-06-2015, 18:55)Fredstersafool Wrote: So Rangers receive money from replica kit sales etc is that what your saying??
What exactly do you think the term "zero" means?