![]() |
Court action over wifi - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26) +----- Forum: Rangers (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=131) +----- Thread: Court action over wifi (/showthread.php?tid=3619) |
RE: Court action over wifi - supercooper - 18-01-2016 In shtook would be the answer Worth. RE: Court action over wifi - Fredstersafool - 18-01-2016 But we're no are we?? RE: Court action over wifi - supercooper - 18-01-2016 Aren't You? How would you possibly know? RE: Court action over wifi - Fredstersafool - 18-01-2016 Trus just posted the accounts,did you not see them?? RE: Court action over wifi - supercooper - 18-01-2016 I just read them not fantastic reading, bearing in mind the main stand will cost into that too. RE: Court action over wifi - Trusevich - 18-01-2016 (18-01-2016, 19:09)TheWorthinGer Wrote: To save me googling - what would their position be if they had no money from the unregistered charity that is FoH? It's difficult to know without knowing how much they're still taking in from the direct debits. The FoH raised £1.47M in the first two years, subsequently converted to equity. If this counts as part of the Anne Budge loan repayment and they expect to take three more years to pay back £1M, then that makes £330k per year. If the losses are £680k per season (and we can be sure that will rise in the next accounts) then it's obvious there's somewhat of a disparity. I suspoect they'll have to sell some of their better players just to even the books. And that's before they even think about a new stand. RE: Court action over wifi - TheWorthinGer - 18-01-2016 (18-01-2016, 19:15)Fredstersafool Wrote: When did I ask anyone to find out for me?? your spouting shite again Worthless. Still you. |