![]() |
Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +----- Thread: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC (/showthread.php?tid=3277) |
RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - peiowl - 20-10-2015 (20-10-2015, 22:32)Maddix Wrote: It's a f uc king joke this Don't bother with the baseball Maddix. Keeping in touch with the game on my cell phone. Jays 4-0 down top of 2nd inning. ![]() ![]() RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Maddix - 20-10-2015 Andy Haines-xxxx ![]() ![]() ![]() RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - peiowl - 20-10-2015 another chance blown. RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Owlkev71 - 20-10-2015 0-0 FT. Good point, despite a dodgy ref. RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - peiowl - 20-10-2015 nought nought. on to the baseball now to see the jays get hammered. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Statesideowl - 20-10-2015 It's the point we'd have taken. but there's no doubt we were robbed.. again.. at loftus As long as we do the job at Toytown we're ok. Nice clean sheet away for Westwood. unbeaten run continues RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Was Wereham Owl - 20-10-2015 Got to see that as a good point against a supposed promotion candidate , well done Wednesday RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Imre varadi - 20-10-2015 A good point and a good clean sheet !! shame we didnt knick it !! but if we beat the scrubbers then a good away point won !!! RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Owlkev71 - 20-10-2015 Attempts/On Target QPR 19-2 OWLS 6-0 Possession 53% RE: Match Thread - QPR v SWFC - Maddix - 20-10-2015 (20-10-2015, 22:46)Statesideowl Wrote: It's the point we'd have taken. but there's no doubt we were robbed.. again.. at loftus I disagree. This was an easy 3 points for us if the ###### had the balls to make the calls he's paid to make ![]() |