Sports Babble - sports forum
Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Printable Version

+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+----- Forum: West Bromwich Albion (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=21)
+----- Thread: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread (/showthread.php?tid=3086)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - talkSAFT - 29-08-2015

We also need a Coaching team who will put some fire into their players.


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Stairs - 29-08-2015

3pts v Stoke is not to be sniffed at. Shame we could not get more goals but I guess Stoke parked the bus, I don't know, just guessing?


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Beefy 1965 - 29-08-2015

Amazing scores going on !!!!

Up to 14th ......

Chelsea 1 - 2 Crystal Palace
Liverpool 0 - 3 West Ham United


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - WBA Will - 29-08-2015

(29-08-2015, 17:56)Stairs Wrote: 3pts v Stoke is not to be sniffed at. Shame we could not get more goals but I guess Stoke parked the bus, I don't know, just guessing?

No, they pushed numbers forward to try and get an equaliser. We were just that bad and slow going forward that we couldn't exploit it.


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - GlassEyedBomber - 29-08-2015

So that's how it feels to be on the other end of it! I take great satisfaction knowing that they feel how I felt every time they beat us.


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - aries22 - 29-08-2015

(29-08-2015, 17:54)wba_1996 Wrote: Very good three points, but make no mistake we wouldn't have if it was 11 v 11.

We have a couple of days left in this window - we need CREATIVITY if we want to stay in this league.

I think we've got creativity. The trouble is, TP isn't using it.
I can't understand his tactics in the second half, to just sit back and invite Stoke onto us. That's just asking for trouble.
11 against 9, we should be running at them, tiring them out.
I just don't understand it. It's not as if we haven't got any good or intelligent players.


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Beefy 1965 - 29-08-2015

(29-08-2015, 18:03)GlassEyedBomber Wrote: So that's how it feels to be on the other end of it! I take great satisfaction knowing that they feel how I felt every time they beat us.

Lol this is quite true ^^^^^^^

And they had to resort to Pullis tactics ............ #THUGS  Laugh


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - May68 - 29-08-2015

Embarrassing. People will say we need more forward players, but our manager deemed it necessary to play 4 centre backs for the whole of that match. Credit to Pulis for taking Yacob off in the first half, but once we had the goal there was no ambition to get a second. I reckon the players were told to slow the game down rather than counter at speed, because whenever there was a chance for a breakaway goal we never took it.
I don't really mind the fact that Stoke came at us at the end. That was always bound to happen. However we should've been out of sight by then.


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Ska'dForLife-WBA - 29-08-2015

(29-08-2015, 17:56)Stairs Wrote: Shame we could not get more goals but I guess Stoke parked the bus, I don't know, just guessing?

They certainly defended doggedly, but we spent the second half playing at the slowest tempo imaginable and finishing off most moves with a poor pass or cross which they mopped up without difficulty.  A couple of times in the second half they left themselves open to a potential counterattack, but instead of hitting them quickly and intelligently, we instead hoofed the ball straight to the one man they had back on the halfway line.  Really, really turgid stuff from us.

The result's just what we needed, but I never seen a team huff and puff so much against nine men.


RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Beefy 1965 - 29-08-2015

Sako scored again away at chelski ...........

Just saying !!!!!!!