![]() |
Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: West Bromwich Albion (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=21) +----- Thread: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread (/showthread.php?tid=3086) |
RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - talkSAFT - 29-08-2015 Don't pick McLean again, Tony RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - May68 - 29-08-2015 I think Gamboa is playing Right Wing. We still have 4 centre backs on the pitch for some reason and that's all our subs used up. RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - wba_1996 - 29-08-2015 Considering we are playing against 9 men, this is appalling. RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - talkSAFT - 29-08-2015 Did someone say one of the teams were playing with 9 men? RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - May68 - 29-08-2015 I reckon Myhill has had to make more saves this second half than Butland. We're not attempting to counter with any urgency and we look clueless when Stoke sit back. RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - baggietrousers - 29-08-2015 FFS they've only got 9 men!!! Every other team in league would be running riot right now!!! RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - bomberbrown1968 - 29-08-2015 Utter garbage - we're as awful against 9 as we are against 11 RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - WBA Will - 29-08-2015 It's truly embarrassing that Stoke have looked the better side this half. We don't look like we're trying to score, so slow and poor on the ball. RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - wba_1996 - 29-08-2015 Very good three points, but make no mistake we wouldn't have if it was 11 v 11. We have a couple of days left in this window - we need CREATIVITY if we want to stay in this league. RE: Stoke vs WBA - Match Thread - Dingle-Dingle - 29-08-2015 Phew 36 more points needed. DD ![]() ![]() |