Sports Babble - sports forum
Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Printable Version

+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Forum: Sky Bet League One (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=79)
+----- Forum: Huddersfield Town (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=70)
+----- Thread: Terriers v t'Owls match thread (/showthread.php?tid=3847)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Was Wereham Owl - 02-04-2016

Scrappy game, well done , nice try, but ultimately undone by Cheaty McCheatface


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Thurnscoe_OWL - 02-04-2016

such a shame that we have to cheat like that to do the double over you lot. Embarrassed by the team today Laugh


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Amelia Chaffinch - 02-04-2016

Well at least leeds lost. There's always joy to be had somewhere. Hey ho.


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Lord Snooty - 02-04-2016

Cheaty McCheatface.   Laugh


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - St Charles Owl - 02-04-2016

(02-04-2016, 18:14)Lord Snooty Wrote: Cheaty McCheatface.   Laugh

I think you have inadvertently helped us find a new nickname for Forestieri!!


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Amelia Chaffinch - 02-04-2016

Smartass From Wereham actually

They definitely saw Lolz as a threat. They were all over him. Same with Scanz when he came on.


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Lord Snooty - 02-04-2016

Clear handball on the line from Lee. Don't know how Blindy McBlindface never saw it. Bet they don't show it on 5 tonight.


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Jacko The Flopsy Piglet - 02-04-2016

(29-03-2016, 10:06)EastLondonTerrier Wrote:
(27-03-2016, 22:38)Jacko The Flopsy Piglet Wrote: To be fair calling someone names has no basis in law and can hardly be called a "fact".

FF does get knocked over by bigger boys a lot though and they really ought to know better. He's gonna score anyway so you might as well just let him get on with it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8INWgyWPGM

Please examine facts before looking through rose tinted spectacles please. This is just one of the many examples of him blatantly cheating. Yes he may get knocked about by big centre backs but that happens to EVERY striker in the league. Nakhi must get 6 or 7 a game that go unpunished by refs but he puts on his big boy pants and gets on with the game instead of getting angry, getting in a strop and trying to get other players sent off.

Think the ref called that one right. Blatant sending off for the Huddersfield, sorry Wolves, player. Never said FF was Gary Lineker, just a professional footballer trying to get an advantage any way he can. I've seen worse "cheats" and I've seen less controversial players, but he scored again and all the whinging in the world won't change that.

(02-04-2016, 18:27)Lord Snooty Wrote: Clear handball on the line from Lee. Don't know how Blindy McBlindface never saw it. Bet they don't show it on 5 tonight.

We should totally banned from all football for our disgraceful cheating and clear attempts to win matches. Bad Wendies!


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - Amelia Chaffinch - 02-04-2016

I think he could be a great player if he managed to stay on his feet more or didn't go in with the studs himself. But, like you say, a goal's a goal.


RE: Terriers v t'Owls match thread - theo_luddite - 02-04-2016

Wendies scored from the only decent move in the match that opened up either defence. Ironically the little Argie scored it sat on his arse which is where he spent most of the match whenever he was challenged by a Town player or passing midge but there you go. The penalty shout, having watched again the Sky highlights was plumb dead centre on the defenders chest. We deserved a point but you don't get what you deserve in this division if you don't take the half chances that come your way. Wendies are far better than L666s so we shouldn't get too down on this one.