![]() |
Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +----- Thread: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC (/showthread.php?tid=3131) |
RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Owlkev71 - 12-09-2015 Hutch with a rash challenge, never learns. RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Owlshighgreen - 12-09-2015 Bugger RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Owlkev71 - 12-09-2015 Great start......................NOT, all thanks to that stupid challenge. RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Statesideowl - 12-09-2015 One effing free kick.. Im already fed up RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Maddix - 12-09-2015 Hutchinson is a waste of fukking space ![]() ![]() RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Imre varadi - 12-09-2015 the link shows me the norwich game thank xxxx !! is it time that the whispers off carlos out should start ?? xxxx useless thrown the game before weve even had a chance !! loovens shouldnt be on the pitch either !!! RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - St Charles Owl - 12-09-2015 If Hutch is going to sit in front of the back four he cannot give away free kicks like that!! RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Statesideowl - 12-09-2015 We have to let Hutch go, he's cost us more points than he's ever won. This is guaranteed to happen every start. Loan window is open and we should be looking. Or CC needs to start browsing the job section. This crap can't keep on happening RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - Was Wereham Owl - 12-09-2015 That feeds working fine for me ... unfortunately !!!! RE: Match Thread - Burnley v SWFC - peiowl - 12-09-2015 Just tuned in. I see Nuhiu i the line up, with Jaoa and Matias on bench. Oh, I get it. NOT. ![]() ![]() |