+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59)
+----- Thread: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves (/showthread.php?tid=3497)
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - Owlkev71 - 21-12-2015
What formation did we play yesterday, RS said 442 but MS said we had 3 up front??
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - Imre varadi - 21-12-2015
Just watched the highlights and it was strange ? it could have finished up 10 -3 to us wallace tried to walk it in the net too many times so did lee and forest just lost the plot going for his hatrick ? nuhuis good work would have been a foul to the other team on another day aswell !! and westwood was xxxx shocking ???? hes been shit for a few games now ???? and i insist he needs dropping just to wake him up !! and yes wolves where terrible there fans must be up the wall after watching a team that didnt give a shit and walked around the park like a kickabout on the sunday playing fields they are a disgrace to football them players , but thankfully there not ours so i dont give a monkeys !!
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - madsteve - 21-12-2015
It was closest to 433 but all the front three moved around a fair bit so it was 4321 at times. As soon as you have three attacking players looking to get in behind a defence then it makes life difficult for them.
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - Statesideowl - 21-12-2015
I thought it looked 433 when I saw the line up, was initially worried we might have been too thin in the Middle.
Thankfully Wolves didn't show up. just as we didn't show up to MK
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - consilio - 21-12-2015
(21-12-2015, 16:47)Owlkev71 Wrote: What formation did we play yesterday, RS said 442 but MS said we had 3 up front??
We did play 442. And 433 and 4321 and 4312 etc
FF started out as an orthodox left winger, tracking back to assist Pudil and when attacking tucking inside to create space for him to get forward from LB.
When we attacked he made an effort to make the forward line a 3 with Wallace exactly the same if we attacked down the right.
Formations in the modern game are so fluid that you can pretty much call it what you want.
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - St Charles Owl - 21-12-2015
(21-12-2015, 15:00)Jacko The Flopsy Piglet Wrote: If only Hooper had scored first rather than last, I think I would have got another point in the BML!
I suppose you can't have everything.
Merry Christmas everybody.
What order the players score in doesn't matter, you did indeed win a
for the correct score and scorer!!
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - peiowl - 21-12-2015
(21-12-2015, 18:47)St Charles Owl Wrote:(21-12-2015, 15:00)Jacko The Flopsy Piglet Wrote: If only Hooper had scored first rather than last, I think I would have got another point in the BML!
I suppose you can't have everything.
Merry Christmas everybody.
What order the players score in doesn't matter, you did indeed win a
does he also get put in the muppett league for not understanding the rules?
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - Jacko The Flopsy Piglet - 23-12-2015
(21-12-2015, 22:03)peiowl Wrote:(21-12-2015, 18:47)St Charles Owl Wrote:(21-12-2015, 15:00)Jacko The Flopsy Piglet Wrote: If only Hooper had scored first rather than last, I think I would have got another point in the BML!
I suppose you can't have everything.
Merry Christmas everybody.
What order the players score in doesn't matter, you did indeed win a
does he also get put in the muppett league for not understanding the rules?
It's not a case of not understanding the rules. I've just never read them!
Ok. I've read the rules now.
I don't understand them!
RE: Match Thread - SWFC v Wolves - Thurnscoe_OWL - 23-12-2015
rules are easy. There's only 1 anyway:
Charlie puts them up, everyone moans.
simple to follow really