+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59)
+----- Thread: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC (/showthread.php?tid=3869)
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - Maddix - 12-03-2016
Like you say, it depends on CC's formation. The danger is that he may feel that playing 4-4-2 (if that's what we played today) has been vindicated by the result today.
Nice to see Dave get the assist for the third. Maybe we will see your line up Chaz but it's hard to see where the energy will come from without Bannan. FF can't do it all.
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - peiowl - 12-03-2016
Ola. Buenos dios. So you're all taking the mickey out of old pei while you think his back is turned? Amigos. Don't do that. He is watching you.
And he doesn't care.
Well done Owls. Hooper scored again. No surprise there. Great signing.
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - Imre varadi - 12-03-2016
Your spanish grammer is laughable old boy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VVTOCtVDN8 heres our carlos !!
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - peiowl - 12-03-2016
(12-03-2016, 22:11)I mre varadi Wrote: Your spanish grammer is laughable old boy!Most of that was in english. Remember that language? A bit like sheffield but with "the" in and "you" instead of "thee." You'll soon catch on.
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - Thurnscoe_OWL - 12-03-2016
(12-03-2016, 19:36)St Charles Owl Wrote:(12-03-2016, 19:34)Thurnscoe_OWL Wrote: Needed a forest goal for £730bastards
Ahhhh well much needed 3 points. Need to carry this on now
Thats what you get for betting against Wednesday!!!!
Wednesday win with both team to score. Didn't get against us at all
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - St Charles Owl - 12-03-2016
(12-03-2016, 22:45)Thurnscoe_OWL Wrote:(12-03-2016, 19:36)St Charles Owl Wrote:(12-03-2016, 19:34)Thurnscoe_OWL Wrote: Needed a forest goal for £730
Ahhhh well much needed 3 points. Need to carry this on now
Thats what you get for betting against Wednesday!!!!
Wednesday win with both team to score. Didn't get against us at all
Pah, technicality!!! You should be betting on an Owls win and clean sheet!!!
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - Thurnscoe_OWL - 12-03-2016
Yeah should have. Although also seen petwrblrough let me down on same bet so not just wednsday being amazing that's stopped me
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - Owlkev71 - 13-03-2016
Just seen the goals and sending off. Bannan does foul the Forest player, he doesn't go flying in two footed, just stretching one footed challenge, a yellow yes, red seemed harsh imo.
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - Maddix - 13-03-2016
They were all amazed at the red on the FL show on C5. It won't cut no ice with the dictatorship though
There's more chance of Robert Mugabe admitting he could have done things differently in Zimbabwe over the last 35 years 
RE: Match Thread - Nottm Forest v SWFC - St Charles Owl - 13-03-2016
(13-03-2016, 00:01)Owlkev71 Wrote: Just seen the goals and sending off. Bannan does foul the Forest player, he doesn't go flying in two footed, just stretching one footed challenge, a yellow yes, red seemed harsh imo.
Thing is he slid form a long way away and went in with his studs showing and caught the guy. I know we feel hard done to after the FF incident but had this been the opposite way round we would have been calling for a red. Its definitely a soft red but we have seen worse get only a yellow and less still get a red.
Assuming we lose him for three games, he should come back fully fit and ready to give everything in the run-in, there will be no need to rest him or for him to get tired!!