![]() |
Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +----- Thread: Match Thread - Ipswich Town (/showthread.php?tid=1327) |
RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Thurnscoe_OWL - 11-02-2015 (11-02-2015, 12:52)Owlkev71 Wrote: "Nuhiu is the best striker we have at the club and until we get someone in who is better and proves it, he should start." Is it not true?? Who have we got who is doing any better? ![]() I've NEVER said he's our saviour. I've NEVER said he's going to fire us to the prem. I've NEVER claimed him to be the best striker in the league. BUT he's the best striker we have and until we get better he HAS to play. And yes it's May's first season down here but many of you were jumping on Nuhiu last season when it was his first season. Nuhiu this season has already matched his goals tally for all of last season RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Amelia Chaffinch - 11-02-2015 I think it's about time maddix apologised for all these accusations he keeps making. I am well peed off with it. RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Thurnscoe_OWL - 11-02-2015 These accusations of being checked up on you mean? You wouldn't see them if you weren't on here checking up on us ![]() RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Amelia Chaffinch - 11-02-2015 I am just reading everything on this site like all site moderators should. I won't be stopping doing that. I don't do it as an invisible user or as a guest or whatever else I am accused of. When all this was being said, snoots and I were either sat at my father-in-law's bedside as he was dying or organising the funeral after he died on Saturday. How dare any of you say we would behave as you suggest? RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Thurnscoe_OWL - 11-02-2015 cheap shot using you father in law to beat us with. How would any of us know that? None of us say anything about invisible users any more (I didn't anyway tbf) because imre only ever logs on as invisible. Sorry for your loss RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Amelia Chaffinch - 11-02-2015 Because it was on our match thread and commented on by sco (comment accepted) and imre (comment deleted). I'm not interested in your sympathy. After all that has been said by owls, I don't want to hear it. I was accused on the other site and I hadn't visited it in days. I am sick of the paranoia, I am sick of being accused of things that I just don't do. I was simply pointing out that if maddix or anyone else thinks he has been my priority over the last few weeks, he is so wrong. I have apologised publicly several times for being wrong on new606, something that I know not everyone is capable of but these suggestions from maddix have to stop. I have not been interested ever of following anyone in particular around the boards unless they are a known troll or wum. I have always read the Wednesday. Even though I know outsiders are not welcome to comment, you cannot ban anyone from reading. I shouldn't have commented. I just saw red when I read maddix' earlier comments. It's just so bloody galling being accused of being a stalker and amending comments that I wasn't even around for at the time! RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Thurnscoe_OWL - 11-02-2015 Maddix's comments were tongue in cheek. If you've read the whole thread you'll see that we were taking the piss out of Charlie for ruining the match thread, when he said he hadn't changed the Kate Beckinsale picture Maddix suggested someone else had done it without him knowing. You'll notice no one ever mentioned you by name, maybe you should stop feeling so insecure and read our threads as they are actually meant to be read Also, we've no problem with people coming on commenting as long as they aren't trying to rile us up, which you lot did when we played each other earlier in the season RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Amelia Chaffinch - 11-02-2015 That's why SCO has the tools to remove any wummers that need removing. If my lot were causing bother, they should have been dealt with. We all have to abide by the same rules and I have no problems with them being given warnings. I will admit I had stopped reading your match threads because of the images so I can't actually pinpoint which Terriers you are referring to. I don't recall there being any reported posts. If they were not dealt with, then please do tell me who needs checking out. RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Thurnscoe_OWL - 11-02-2015 The big problem was the time difference and some villagers taking advantage of it in order to wum on here. Charlie cleaned it up when he logged back on the day after and as far as I'm aware, he had a chat with all moderators in your hidden elitist club about snuffing anything out before it all boiled over again. We don't do post reporting on here because we self police and perhaps, if we had reported, the mod team would have found some of our replies to be less savoury. RE: Match Thread - Ipswich Town - Amelia Chaffinch - 11-02-2015 No, there are very few posts reported but some of them obviously bother you. I have looked at it and, yes, I remember it now. I think that SCO decided to leave the comments so we all went with it. They're certainly no worse than ones posted elsewhere. So you see the Wendies as the victims in all this? That's a serious question btw not a wum. |