+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+----- Forum: Rangers (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=131)
+----- Thread: RIFC (/showthread.php?tid=130)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 08-09-2014
What are they doing wrong just now, Fred? All these 'troubles' are legacy ones from previous boards.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 08-09-2014
Okidoki.
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 09-09-2014
As suspected, right to appeal Ahmad's case has been granted. No monies are ring-fenced, appeal to be heard in November apparently.
Prophets of impending doom apoplectic.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 09-09-2014
If there is no money to be ring-fenced then why is there an appeal in November??
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 09-09-2014
To avoid it becoming ring-fenced.
The ring-fencing warrant has been replaced with a court advised urge "to come to a deal with Ahmad over security for the sum while the sides wait for the case to return to court".
I suspect the club will be quite busy in the intervening months. I doubt if there will be time to arrange anything with Mr Ahmad. Which would be a shame. . .
In the mean-time, our cash-flow is unaffected and the share option can proceed unhindered.
All your claims, Fred, of not being able to fulfil fixtures, your heartfelt hopes and wishes for us to die, are fast becoming nothing but demented cries for help.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 09-09-2014
Those claims may still come to fruition Trus,the share issue isn't certain to be a success,anyhow thanks for clearing that up for me.
Just been told the money is ring-fenced but the appeal to day was to allow Rangers to appeal that decision in November,now Trus don't go radge at me is the money ring-fenced or not??
RE: RIFC - TIN TIN - 09-09-2014
Yes Fred, it is ringfenced as per statement released today by RIFC
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 09-09-2014
Feeding me shite Trus Tut tut.
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 09-09-2014
Andy Newport @Andythemod9 3 mins
Latest on Rangers v Ahmad case: Warrant to ring fence cash has NOT been actioned as of now. But Ahmad DOES retain right to do so & could.../ /freeze cash sometime before Friday's deadline for open offer. Case due to be heard on November 11 but Rangers hoping to find sooner date
Agreement between Rangers/Ahmad seems to have happened. Cash is clearly not ring-fenced as of no.
Quote:But Lord Stewart decided that granting Rangers the right to appeal would "facilitate the raising of fresh capital" through the open offer and ultimately "benefit both parties".
He also urged Rangers to come to a deal with Ahmad over security for the sum while the sides wait for the case to return to court.
The warrant freezing the cash has also been lifted while a date for the appeal is set.
Rangers statement is confusing, granted.
RE: RIFC - TIN TIN - 09-09-2014
I would have thought that the club statement would be the correct facts, ( clearly stating that the cash is ringfenced) but hey, who knows