![]() |
The lies about Ideye Fee! - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: West Bromwich Albion (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=21) +----- Thread: The lies about Ideye Fee! (/showthread.php?tid=1158) |
RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - drewks - 13-01-2015 (12-01-2015, 23:39)Stathemwasthebestever Wrote: I think it does make a difference. If we all knew Ideye had been bought for 2.5m plus multiple add ons (or whatever it was) as opposed to to 10m (or whatever it was) it would have changed the weight of expectation on the player. Who knows, he might still be struggling but some footballers do labour with a transfer fee on their heads. Good post Stathem.....shouldn't that be 'Statham' tho? ![]() There is just so much crap/spin/mumbo jumbo going on in football at every professional level - it ain't just us. But you're dead right, it'd be so much better to do without all this rubbish and just tell the supporters - who ARE the club really - what's going on, and stop this stupid style of non-information ![]() RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - Superbobgod - 13-01-2015 Exactly the point of my thread - Statham/Drewks! RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - Stathemwasthebestever - 13-01-2015 (13-01-2015, 00:21)drewks Wrote:(12-01-2015, 23:39)Stathemwasthebestever Wrote: I think it does make a difference. If we all knew Ideye had been bought for 2.5m plus multiple add ons (or whatever it was) as opposed to to 10m (or whatever it was) it would have changed the weight of expectation on the player. Who knows, he might still be struggling but some footballers do labour with a transfer fee on their heads. Drewks...likewise on the posts; always read your's with interest and almost always agree. However....I do blush.....it should be '....tham' as opposed to 'them' as talkSAFT gently pointed out to me last week. DS was my favouite player as a kid and once gave me one of his No 3 shirts (after repeated begging!). However this was the late 70s and there were no names on shirts and that's my poor excuse for mentally, and now actually, mispelling his name for 40 years. Hope he forgives me...sure he will, he was a class act in a team of Brawn, Cantella and Osbourn! RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - BBB - 13-01-2015 Can someone tell me in a transfer why it is not disclosed = why a secret? ![]() (12-01-2015, 02:27)Superbobgod Wrote: Brown Ideye was not a £10m siging or £8.8m as has been revised in press recently! Why didn't Brown say anything, was he under a gagging clause? Incidentally I watched Father Brown tonight on BBC - good. RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - aries22 - 13-01-2015 Did anyone watch Tony Pulis's first media interview after his appointment? Terry Burton was sitting next to him and was squirming, especially when TP said the relationship between a manager and the chairman is a really important one, never mind that the management reporting line goes TP-Terry Burton-JP! I honestly can't see how TP is ever going to report to Terry Burton, who seems hopelessly out of his depth with such a strong character and proven manager as TP. What TP wants, he will let Terry Burton know for sure, but Pulis will then speak directy to JP. TP has already said he's sat down with JP to tell him what's required in the January window. I could never imagine any of that happening under Alan Irvine. I reckon Terry Burton already feels redundant. Good old TP! He's just what the doctor ordered. RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - talkSAFT - 13-01-2015 (13-01-2015, 04:22)aries22 Wrote: Did anyone watch Tony Pulis's first media interview after his appointment? Terry Burton was sitting next to him and was squirming, especially when TP said the relationship between a manager and the chairman is a really important one, never mind that the management reporting line goes TP-Terry Burton-JP! Not necessarily, Aries. That formula has served us well for 10 years or so. RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - aries22 - 13-01-2015 It certainly served us well up until Dan Ashworth left, talkSAFT. Then we had Richard Garlick in the role and he failed at it and reverted to a Sporting Director role, and I honestly don't see, or haven't seen, what difference Terry Burton's made so far. Under him and Mervyn Day (the latter only to a certain extent because he joined us late last summer) a few of our signings have been a bit iffy, and I can't see what else he's done. I do stand to be corrected, as always. But there's no question that, after Pepe Mel and Alan Irvine, something needed to be shaken up, and TP is the man to do it IMHO. RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - Foxman_WBA - 14-01-2015 I don’t see how this has taken until now to come to light! How has the world of football thought he was our most expensive transfer when he was nowhere near! Has JP that little faith in the fans that he thinks that all the matters is the cash spent? If we all knew we’d signed a player of his age and his record for effectively 2.5mil, surely no-one could have complained at that? Hopefully now with TP at the helm all of these crazy shenanigans are behind us and we can concentrate on playing football! RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - talkSAFT - 14-01-2015 (14-01-2015, 12:30)Foxman_WBA Wrote: I don’t see how this has taken until now to come to light! Well said, Foxman. Unfortunately there were many fans on WBA-Mad who would have been appalled that we had "only" spent £2.5m. Many were creaming themselves that we had spent £10m - good or bad. One the other day was quite upset and disappointed that we'd only squandered £2.5m. (I use the word "squandered" with respect to Ideye!) RE: The lies about Ideye Fee! - aries22 - 14-01-2015 It does seem very strange that Brown Ideye has been paraded as a £10m buy - or at least no one's gone on record to clarify or deny that - and now there's speculation he's only cost us £2.5m up front? |