![]() |
The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +----- Thread: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread (/showthread.php?tid=10756) |
RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Was Wereham Owl - 22-10-2021 4-1 Gregory 22.663 AAHHA RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - peiowl - 23-10-2021 2-1 Paterson hhhhh 23001 RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Imre varadi - 23-10-2021 He's dropped the donkeys Patterson and Dunkley he's going for pace today with intent to wake Hillsborough up . RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Statesideowl - 23-10-2021 Do my eyes deceive me, or is that two up front at Hillsborough? RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Owlkev71 - 23-10-2021 Palmer at CB. Looks like a back four, as for the rest, not sure, could be 442, 433 or 4231. RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Washington - 23-10-2021 (23-10-2021, 15:17)Owlkev71 Wrote: Palmer at CB. BBC shows it as 4-2-3-1 so it’s probably 4-4-2 ![]() RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Imre varadi - 23-10-2021 To be fair to palmer he is probably better at center back as he is no good attacking whatsoever ! Trouble is if he loses position here we are flucked ! RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Washington - 23-10-2021 Anybody else having trouble with IFollow ?? RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - Statesideowl - 23-10-2021 We've scored 14. Only four teams in the league have scored less RE: The Owls v Lincoln City L1 Match Thread - St Charles Owl - 23-10-2021 (23-10-2021, 15:59)Washington Wrote: Anybody else having trouble with IFollow ?? No working fine for me. |