+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+----- Forum: Rangers (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=131)
+----- Thread: RIFC (/showthread.php?tid=130)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
RE: RIFC - supercooper - 10-03-2016
All he had to do was read the article stating that was the case. Maybe it's a Salt and Sauce slant.
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 10-03-2016
TheWorthinGer Wrote:TIN TIN Wrote:"The club continues to require funding to meet its ongoing cash shortfall " was a wee sneepit tagged on near the end of the statement. Thougts on that please
It's not a huge worry as they have always said it would be exchanged for equity.
It's not as if they have loaned 5 million and get 500k every year in perpetuity for it.
supercooper Wrote:All he had to do was read the article stating that was the case. Maybe it's a Salt and Sauce slant.
Or my initial response to his request for thoughts.
RE: RIFC - supercooper - 10-03-2016
(10-03-2016, 16:16)TheWorthinGer Wrote:TheWorthinGer Wrote:TIN TIN Wrote:"The club continues to require funding to meet its ongoing cash shortfall " was a wee sneepit tagged on near the end of the statement. Thougts on that please
It's not a huge worry as they have always said it would be exchanged for equity.
It's not as if they have loaned 5 million and get 500k every year in perpetuity for it.
supercooper Wrote:All he had to do was read the article stating that was the case. Maybe it's a Salt and Sauce slant.
Or my initial response to his request for thoughts.
He obviously chooses to ignore what's directly in front of him.
RE: RIFC - Larry-AV - 18-03-2016
18/03/2016 : Another win for Rangers ... this time in Court.
Rangers FC - Charles Green – Legal Proceedings
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 18-03-2016
Is this the one where Green's lawyer tried to claim that Rangers were a new club, to howls of laughter from the judge and the assembled benches? You mean these claims have been unanimously and independently thrown out?
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 18-03-2016
(18-03-2016, 19:05)Trusevich Wrote: Is this the one where Green's lawyer tried to claim that Rangers were a new club, to howls of laughter from the judge and the assembled benches? You mean these claims have been unanimously and independently thrown out?
Don't tell frivolous fred and hilarious hibernations.
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 22-03-2016
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/business/company-results-forecasts/rangers-football-club-ltd-reports-7604504#1iCz3yKDKGu9OUok.97
15/16 accounts published - final days of the disastrous regime. Not great but I'm asssuming the next ones will be considerably better.
RE: RIFC - hibeejim21 - 22-03-2016
"final days of the disastrous regime"
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 22-03-2016
Which disastrous regime you on about there was more than one.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 26-03-2016
Will Dave King need another soft loan to pay yer fine??