+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+----- Forum: Rangers (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=131)
+----- Thread: RIFC (/showthread.php?tid=130)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
RE: RIFC - struth - 16-11-2015
Inverness is Sassenach country compared to Tru's lofty abode
RE: RIFC - Maroon 1 - 16-11-2015
Any merit or validity in this?
https://johnjamessite.wordpress.com/2015/11/16/kings-cunning-plan/
or has this "contributer" to the debate already been discredited ?
Genuine question
RE: RIFC - struth - 16-11-2015
yup,
alway right and never wrong but sometimes twisted
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 16-11-2015
(16-11-2015, 23:27)Maroon 1 Wrote: Any merit or validity in this?
https://johnjamessite.wordpress.com/2015/11/16/kings-cunning-plan/
or has this "contributer" to the debate already been discredited ?
Genuine question
I think your poor choice of wording betrays your piss-poor attempt at 'furthering debate'.
The answer to your question stares you in your face.
RE: RIFC - Maroon 1 - 17-11-2015
Looks like the word and punctuation police made the move over here too. That was a genuine question with a wee barb in it that I thought might have been taken seriously for once. I'm unsure or the guy's bona fides so was looking to see what you guys thought......obviously the deflector shields are still up
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 17-11-2015
Six men in a room all agreed that 2+2=5, meanwhile, outside the room....
RE: RIFC - Maroon 1 - 17-11-2015
Oblique references still walk the corridors as well?
.....just like old times 
RE: RIFC - TIN TIN - 17-11-2015
Your wasting your time Maroon. They don't want to debate anything, just keep their heads in the sand and all will come up roses. Can't see that they are being ripped off again by the shameless one and his cronies. MA just waiting in the wings to pounce, then kaboom.
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 17-11-2015
See, when you come out with such an unadulterated, fantastically twisted work of fiction as that it takes a special kind of suspension of belief to try to pass it off as a viable, serious point.
Laughably so, in fact.
RE: RIFC - Larry-AV - 17-11-2015
16/11/2015 : From the CoS website, business at the Court of Session, 17/11/2015.
LORD BOYD OF DUNCANSBY
09 P1039/15 Pet: Mash Holdings Ltd for Judicial Review - Brodies LLP
10 P989/15 Pet: Michael Ashley for Judicial Review - Brodies LLP
LORD WOOLMAN
1 P1127/15 Note: The Rangers FC Group Ltd re: adjudication of claim - ADLP Solicitors
I suppose we will have more debate on these matters tomorrow onwards.
Also listed :
P1114/15 Pet: Margarita Monque‑Venturoli for recall for inhibition - Blackadders LLP
... Baldrick at the CoS ?!
