+- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Scottish Football League (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+---- Forum: Scottish Premiership (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+----- Forum: Rangers (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=131)
+----- Thread: RIFC (/showthread.php?tid=130)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 09-11-2015
Which is avoiding paying tax then,regardless of how you dress it up it's still illegal.
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 09-11-2015
No, you're wrong. There is a clear difference between a 'tax avoidance scheme' and 'not paying tax'.
Tax avoidance schemes are NOT ILLEGAL.
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 09-11-2015
I never said they weren't I said Craig Whyte avoided paying PAYE.
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 09-11-2015
He avoided doing lots of things. So what?
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 09-11-2015
So he was paying for players he couldn't afford therefore he cheated and Rangers rightfully entered administration due to debts the club run up,then liquidation because they couldn't get a CVA, they cheated right from Murray through to Whyte end of story.
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 09-11-2015
Again, you'll have to prove he was paying for players he couldn't afford. This was all explained to you ages ago, yet you still struggle to understand? Bizarre.
Plus, you seem to be under the impression that entering administration is cheating. Hearts did it too. OK, Hearts agreed a CVA, but answer me this - what percentage did the creditors get in the settlement?
RE: RIFC - Fredstersafool - 09-11-2015
Not entirely sure but if you look back I agreed we cheated
RE: RIFC - Trusevich - 09-11-2015
The point is, BDO will be trying to get as close to 100% for the creditors as they can. That's why they'll appeal. They already have £24M and would be due even more.
Hearts' CVA didn't even reach 5p in the pound.
RE: RIFC - TheWorthinGer - 09-11-2015
This place is slowly turning into the previous shitehole.
RE: RIFC - 0762 - 09-11-2015
(09-11-2015, 18:32)Trusevich Wrote: No, you're wrong. There is a clear difference between a 'tax avoidance scheme' and 'not paying tax'.
Tax avoidance schemes are NOT ILLEGAL.
It's the interpretation of said schemes that has been open to question by many qualified financial experts and that is the knub of this whole debate - what is a loan and what is construed to be part of a salary? Some of these schemes were above aboard and of no interest to HMRC. The likes of Rangers oldco's EBT scheme was an illegal manipulation to gain a clear benefit over the British tax payer and that's why HMRC rightly never let this issue go away and stuck with it to it's rightful conclusion!!