![]() |
The Owls v Millwall SBC Match Thread - Printable Version +- Sports Babble - sports forum (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk) +-- Forum: Football (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: English Football Leagues (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +---- Forum: Sky Bet Championship (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +----- Forum: Sheffield Wednesday (https://www.sportsbabble.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +----- Thread: The Owls v Millwall SBC Match Thread (/showthread.php?tid=13510) |
RE: The Owls v Millwall SBC Match Thread - Owlkev71 - 07-01-2025 BML Update Pei deducted a ![]() Imre awarded a ![]() RE: The Owls v Millwall SBC Match Thread - Maddix - 07-01-2025 (07-01-2025, 20:14)Imre varadi Wrote: Pieowl copied statesides attendance prediction there for his predictions where null .and there nearest to his GT Imre should be awarded the points ! .and he's banned for the Coventry game But he wasn't banned for this game so his GT prediction should still stand ![]() RE: The Owls v Millwall SBC Match Thread - St Charles Owl - 07-01-2025 (07-01-2025, 22:56)Maddix Wrote:(07-01-2025, 20:14)Imre varadi Wrote: Pieowl copied statesides attendance prediction there for his predictions where null .and there nearest to his GT Imre should be awarded the points ! .and he's banned for the Coventry game Correct, he is banned from the next game and his attendance prediction is void for this game. Rules are rules!!! RE: The Owls v Millwall SBC Match Thread - Imre varadi - 08-01-2025 Rule number 6 quite clearly states the plural void predictions Maddix ![]() |